Hunts for Heroes Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
208359700
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
El Campo, TX, USA
Phone
9796370370
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Support N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$7,079
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BILLY HODGES (PRESIDENT)
  • STEVE APPLING (VICE PRESIDENT - ADMINISTR)
  • STEVEN WEINHEIMER (VICE PRESIDENT - FINANCE)
  • PHILIP URBANOVSKY (VICE PRESIDENT - OVERALL O)
  • DARRELL SMITH (VICE PRESIDENT - OPERATION)

People named in this filing

  • BILLY HODGES (PRESIDENT)
  • STEVE APPLING (VICE PRESIDENT - ADMINISTR)
  • STEVEN WEINHEIMER (VICE PRESIDENT - FINANCE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Dedicated to serving the men and women of the us military. Educating wounded soldiers of their capabilities, not their disabilities, in an outdoor environment. Focus on reconnecting soldiers with their family.

What it reported doing in 2014

Dedicated to serving the men and women of the u.s. Military. To educate wounded soldiers of their capabilities, not their disabilities. Host, transport, feed and educate the healing soldier and their family in an outdoor environment. Also focuses on reconnecting the soldier with his family.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -150% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -147.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -141% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2012 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.