Hunts for Healing Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272034894
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Laceyville, PA, USA
Phone
7742301481
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Military, Veterans' Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$127,489
Expenses
$116,950
Assets
$282,740
Liabilities
$7,484

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PETE HATTON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PETE HATTON (PRESIDENT)
  • MARK WIERNUSZ (VICE PRESIDE)
  • JAMES REYNOLDS (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to raise funds to finance events that promote challenges in the outdoors for seriously wounded military personnel returning from oef missions in afghanistan, oif missions in iraq, and stand ready to serve future operations. Form 990-ez, part iii, line 28 - statement of program service accomplishments.

What it reported doing in 2025

We have helped wounded veterans with challenges presented to them with the outdoors. We offer them hunter safety course if they need it, outfit them with the necessary gear they need depending on what they would like to accomplish outdoors, including but not limited to outdoor mobility equipment. We offer hunter and firearms safety, clay target shooting, various types of hunting, fishing, camping, boating and hiking.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.2%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 92.5%; rating input score 92

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.3%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.42; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.2% of revenue deployed · 92.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $108K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.