Huntington Human Services Institute Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
113248145
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Huntington, NY, USA
Phone
6313513038
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Senior Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$152,263
Expenses
$181,324
Assets
$133,577
Liabilities
$1,670

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EDMUND J SMYTH (PRESIDENT)
  • DR DAVID BENNARDO (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • EDMUND J SMYTH (PRESIDENT)
  • DR DAVID BENNARDO (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • LAURA CAREY (TREASURER (FORMER))

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To organize, operate and maintain programs for disadvantaged residents of the town of huntington in order to assist them to reach their full educational, occupational and economic potential, including a daytime senior day care center for the frail and elderly.b) to research and develop referral services for senior citizens, physically challenged and disadvantaged individuals with regards to issues which may have an impact on the quality of their lives.c) to encourage increased involvement in civic and social activities through cooperation and coordination of efforts with other public and private groups and organizations.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization also provides other various programming during the year including: christmas for the underprivileged, relay for life, town events, holiday parade, hispanic heritage program, antibias program, and project play.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -19.1%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -12.2% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.