Hunger Impact Partners
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473688803
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6123385551
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $184,195
- Expenses
- $323,688
- Assets
- $197,717
- Liabilities
- $6,571
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- ELINOR P LUCAS (CHIEF EXEC O): $167,352 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Change the trajectory of hunger-relief for Minnesota's children living in urban, suburban, and rural economic hardship so they can realize their academic potential.
What it reported doing in 2024
Hunger impact partners provides grants ranging from 2000-5000 for nutrition education, promotion and marketing, compliance training, start-up and infrastructure costs, technology solutions, listening sessions, convenings, and staffing resources for the specific federal meal programs we support. After school meals high-quality after school programs for low-income kids help close the achievement gap, keeps them safe and develops skills for success. Our grants address barriers including administrative requirements, lack of exposure and education of the program and its value to students and their families. Targeting marginalized neighborhoods that are community eligible for meal supports, we collaborate with community-based organizations offering academic enrichment or remedial programs to help them establish meal sponsors so they can serve meals during their programming. We focus on meal gaps and support meal sponsor education, recruiting and trainings. As planned, we established 8 new after school meal serving sites reaching 500 elementary and middle school students during the 2024-25 school year. Summer meals & beyond we created the free meals for kids mobile app and manage, expand, and promote it. Developed initially to help kids, families, community partners and safety net service providers locate meals, food, and community resources. It has been expanded to include childcare center sites offering meals, after-school academic programs serving meals, summer programs that offer scholarships, free family meals sites, holiday food giveaways, backpack programs, fare for all grocery sites, twin cities mobile market locations, and free summer feeding sites in economically eligible neighborhoods. We continue to recruit new meal sponsors and fund expansion for existing sites which is part of our core local community funding strategy. Sites are located at parks, rec centers, libraries, affordable housing complexes, community-based organizations, schools-public, private, charter, and tribal sites. The app is also used to inform users of financial supports, opportunities to participate in research studies, and time-sensitive information via a "push" notification feature. We have nearly 48,000 active users statewide. Childcare center meals working with our early childhood network of partners, we recruit centers who have the potential to provide meals but are not by developing a qualified lead generation process "let's eat" that can screen for citations, site capacity, and percentage of free/reduced children. We provide education on cacfp, guides for evaluating sponsors and developed a self-sponsor toolkit. We continue to advocate for federal/state program changes in cacfp to ease the administrative burden of operating sponsors. We fund tablets and subscriptions for web-based record-keeping and financial management platforms to aid multi-sponsors with reporting and compliance requirements. We manage a network initiative with salvation army, ymca, boys and girls clubs, and headstart to utilize cacfp for meals offered at their sites. We have helped 17 childcare centers start meal programs now feeding 500 children birth to 5. Healthy food from birth to 5 with only 50% of children ages 1-4 enrolled in wic in mn, we host frequent listening sessions learning about barriers to participation. Focusing on children ages 2-4 whose families are not enrolled, we developed with the uofm school of nursing a public health practicum to provide free medical check-ups for 25 families at licensed childcare centers to facilitate certification in wic and remote enrollment for eligible children. We created a wic promotion video for childcare centers to educate families on wic's nutritional benefits and online shopping option. We also work with wic agencies in ramsey and hennepin counties through a collaborative we organized that includes the american academy of pediatrics/mn chapter, hennepin healthcare, african american babies coalition and head start.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 78
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 85.7%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 53.7%; rating input score 54; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -75.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 51.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.2% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 85.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $277K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $167K · 5 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 28 of 30 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.