Humble Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453984807
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2012
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Suwanee, GA, USA
Phone
6782253116
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Government and Public Administration

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,907
Expenses
$12,235
Assets
$21,672

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Humble inc. Is an organization devoted to educating the american public on the importance of and need for humility in leadership. Humble, inc. Does not endorse candidates or a political party initiative or special interest campaign. We hope to change the perception of the election from one of political contest to a legitimate job interview, one that should be considered the highest level in the nation. We want to ask the questions of political candidates that unveil who they are and how they lead, not just focus on what they have accomplished. We want to ensure that our country selects a leader grounded in true humility - a servant-leader that will be a role model in transforming the leadership culture in america.

What it reported doing in 2012

Our primary strategy for accomplishing our mission is our humble for president campaign. It will operate like a political social campaign and will be a vehicle to guide the american public through four major waves of influence. Each wave will reveal a deeper understanding of humility-based leadership and how they can practice it on a daily basis. The four waves are awareness, buy-in, referral, and action in business and community. The humble for president campaign and related activities represent 100% of the time and resources of humble.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The available information about grant readiness automatic revocation leaves an important question unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.9%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23.1%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.77; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.