HumanGood

Legal name: Humangood Affordable Housing

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943085296
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Duarte, CA, US
Phone
(818) 247-0420
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Supportive Housing for Older Adults

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$68,106,039
Expenses
$11,760,580
Assets
$234,848,509
Liabilities
$30,003,267

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN H COCHRANE III (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
  • CINDY PROCTOR (VICE PRESIDENT OF DEVELOPMENT)
  • DONALD BRIAN LLOYD (VICE PRESIDENT OF DEVELOPMENT)
  • KENDRA ROBERTS (VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOHN H COCHRANE III (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $1,566,593 total reported compensation
  • DANIEL OGUS (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $1,147,903 total reported compensation
  • ANDREW MCDONALD (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $758,654 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support HumanGood’s leadership in serving older adults with an innovative spirit and transformative action.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide rental housing and related facilities and services to low-income elderly individuals. Provide affordable housing management services to various properties owned or sponsored by unaffiliated organizations in addition to the affordable housing management services provided to the organization's properties. Provide professional consulting services in the development and construction of affordable housing communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Affiliate-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 20
  • Transparency & Controls: 69
  • Accountability: 32
  • Sustainability: 85
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 13.3%; rating input score 13
  • Program expense ratio: 38.5%; rating input score 39
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 82.7%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 19.97; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.8%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 13.3% of revenue deployed · 38.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.6M · 27 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 140 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 13/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 39/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.