Humane Society of Western Montana

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810290933
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Missoula, MT, USA
Phone
4065493934
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,789,427
Expenses
$2,009,912
Assets
$3,504,728
Liabilities
$675,051

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARTA PIERPOINT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • SAMANTHA MITCHELL (SHELTER MEDICINE DIRECTOR): $109,772 total reported compensation
  • MARTA PIERPOINT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $106,940 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The humane society of western Montana builds opportunities for pets and people to thrive. We devote all available resources to nourish the human-animal bond.we offer adoption services, training classes, humane education, behavior consultations, and veterinary care for cats and dogs. We work with volunteers and supporters to improve the welfare of pets in our care and beyond. On average we adopt out 1,400 pets annually. In 2024 we provided nearly 7,000 vaccines to pets and served nearly 2,200 surgical patients in our low and no cost clinics. We regularly stock our local food bank as well as on-site food and pet supplies for pet owners in need of support.the core of our success is over 60 years of resolve to learn, research, adapt, and offer the best welfare practices, innovating whenever necessary to achieve our goals.

What it reported doing in 2024

All available resources are devoted to nourish the human-animal bond. The humane society offers adoption services, training classes, humane education, behavior consultation and medical outreach for dogs and cats. The humane society works with volunteers and supporters to improve the welfare of pets in the shelter and beyond. Approximately 1,400 animals are adopted into homes annually. Thousands more are served through our field medical services, pet food, adoptions, and behavior hot line. In 2024 we provided over 7,000 vaccines to pets and served nearly 2,200 surgical patients in our low and no cost clinics. We regularly stock our local food bank as well as on-site food and pet supplies for pet owners in need of support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.8%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 85.4%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.37 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.3%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.74; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.8%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.8% of revenue deployed · 85.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $110K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.