Humane Society of Greater Miami- Dade for Pocta Aap

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
590711176
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
North Miami Beach, FL, USA
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,021,191
Expenses
$3,930,754
Assets
$11,846,069
Liabilities
$477,867

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • DR CHRISTINA TRABANCO (MEDICAL DOCT): $198,014 total reported compensation
  • JOSSIE AGUIRRE (EXECUTIVE DI): $197,891 total reported compensation
  • CODY MCCALL (CHIEF FINANC): $151,639 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Matching furry friends with their purr-fect homes & offering affordable spay/neuter.

What it reported doing in 2024

Low-cost veterinary clinic: the spay and neuter clinic is guided by empirical evidence demonstrating a direct link between pet overpopulation and the absence of sterilization protocols. An integral facet of our mission is the provision of economically viable and accessible spay and neuter services, along with low-cost animal vaccines and parasite preventatives. Located in north miami beach, our facility operates as a cost-effective provider of preventive veterinary care. Our primary objective is the mitigation of pet overpopulation within our local community, in alignment with the county's overarching aim of achieving "no kill community" status. In pursuit of these objectives, we conducted over 6,000 low-cost spay and neuter surgeries throughout the calendar year of 2024. Soffer & fine animal adoption center: annually, we welcome thousands of unwanted, neglected, abused, and otherwise displaced animals into our care. Through our dedicated efforts, we grant these animals a renewed opportunity by providing compassionate nurturing, nourishment, safe shelter, and exemplary medical care, including vital preventative vaccinations and spay or neuter procedures. We vow to support them for as long as necessary until we find them loving, responsible, and committed homes. The society's other programs and services include humane education, off- site adoptions, outreaches, donor stewarding and volunteer services. The humane society of greater miami believes that the building of a more kind, just and loving community for the pets and people of miami-dade county begins with instilling the values of kindness and compassion. At public and private schools, scouting troops, special needs groups, local libraries, various community youth organizations as well as adult organizations, the humane society of greater miami teaches the young and old appropriate lessons about kindness to animals, empathy and compassion, responsible pet care, and the causes and results of pet overpopulation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 81.5%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.27 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -30.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.01; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 20.4%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94% of revenue deployed · 81.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $198K · 24 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.