Humane League of Lancaster County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
231489846
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2013
Forms available
Form 990 2013
Location
Lancaster, PA, USA
Phone
7173936551
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,000,711
Expenses
$1,468,153
Assets
$3,792,241
Liabilities
$219,595

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOAN BROWN (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOAN BROWN (PRESIDENT & CEO): $75,241 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The hllc shelters, protects and adopts pets in lancaster county. Our focus is preventive programs, including aggressive spay/neuter initiatives; trap-neuter return for feral cats; behavioral interventions; and education. With this proactive approach the league seeks to reduce pet overpopulation and create a community where all pets are protected and wanted.

What it reported doing in 2013

The hllc shelters, protects and adopts pets in lancaster county, and educates community members about responsible pet ownership. The organizations focus is on providing pet retention services that support owners in keeping their pets in their home rathr than relinquishing them ot a shelter, as well as providing life-saving programs that increase the number of homeless animals placed into homes and with rescue organizations.saving lives thorugh adoption and rescues: in 2013, 924 cats were adopted or accepted by rescues, while 501 dogs were adopted or accepted by rescues. Preventative care and spay/neuter: the hllc operates a wellness clinic for members of the public to establish positive, long term relationships between pet owners and a veterinarian. Pet owners can bring their companion animal to the wellness clnic to receive preventative veterinary care such as annual exams and vaccinations, as well as to treat common ailments. The hllc also offers spay and neuter surgery to the public's companion animals one day a week, to actively work towards preventing unwanted litters and ensuring the health of adult animals. Animal cruelty investigations: in 2013, the hllc partnered with the Pennsylvania spca to support the position of a humane law enforcement officer to cover the lancaster county area. Through this unique partnership, the hllc is able to continue supporting animal cruelty investigation services to protect animals in our community. Foster care programs/domestic violence services: the shelters foster care coordinator places animals in need of extra medical care or socialization into temporary foster care homes. The foster care parents extend the shelters capacity for housing pets as these animals are cared for in private homes. In addition, the shelter provides temporary housing for the pets of women entering the domestic violence services residential programs and other emergency situations on a case by case basis, so that owners can be reunited with their pets once they are in a position to care for them again.humane education: hllc volunteers go out into the community to talk about the hllcs mission, and to educate community members on the essentials of responsible pet ownership.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 67.1%; rating input score 67
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.25 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -46.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.58; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -38% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 67.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $985K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $75K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.