Human Resource Professionals Of

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411669328
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2010
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2010
Location
St Paul, MN, USA
Phone
6512883434
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$99,754
Expenses
$100,849
Assets
$20,870

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide a forum for human resource professionals seeking to enhance their professional & personal development

What it reported doing in 2010

Hosts monthly meetings that have between 50-100 attendees each month. These meetings provide for & encourage the mutual exchange of ideas & sharing of common interest through networking & educational speakers. Hrp hosts a spring & fall conference yearly that has over 100 attendees at each conference. These meetings are full day conferences that help increase awareness of current trends & socioeconomic issues impacting the human resources profession.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 4
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 6%; rating input score 6
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.1%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 6% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2010
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.