Human Life Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222625105
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- York, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7178547615
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Right to Life
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $777,017
- Expenses
- $612,410
- Assets
- $1,201,911
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Leona Rega (Executive Director)
- Russ Denning (President)
- Jack Kennedy (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Leona Rega (Executive Director): $72,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Human Life Services is a life affirming Christ-centered pregnancy care organization serving York through medical services, peer counseling, education and community referrals.
What it reported doing in 2024
Education, Mentoring and Material Assistance Services: This program provides education, support, mentoring and community referrals to women and men facing an unplanned pregnancy. This service also provides information regarding a woman's alternatives regarding her pregnancy decision, which include abortion, parenting or adoption. During the 2024 calendar year there were 691 classes for mentoring provided by trained volunteers to 90 individual clients. Material assistance was also given by handing out 644 dozen diapers, 43 cans of formula and other infant supplies for new mothers. Clothing was provided to 53 clients. Unplanned pregnancy, emergency supply materials were handed out during the year to 61 men and women.Evidence-based medical information was provided to 274 women and 43 men and Post-Abortion support services were also provided to 85 women and 7 men. There were 66 babies born to clients in 2024 and 223 Bibles were distributed.The majority of the education, mentoring and material assistance services are provided by volunteers, thus significantly reducing the program service costs and total costs to the Organization.Recognizing a growing community need for parenting classes, life skills, healing from trauma, connection to other community resources, and medical services to those facing an unplanned pregnancy, Human Life Services expanded their program service space to now include an additional building already located on the property. This building is known as the Carriage House and it's renovation was completed at the end of 2024. The new space creates an Educational Resource building with ADA accessibility. The expanded footprint on the property will allow for the creation of a targeted program for fathers, increase the client counseling room and class room space, while providing more rooms and hours to meet with clients seeking STI testing, pregnancy tests and ultrasounds.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.3%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 67.1%; rating input score 67
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.33 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.2%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.96; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.8%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.3% of revenue deployed · 67.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $411K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $72K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 51/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.