Hui Hanai

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237086372
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Honolulu, HI, USA
Phone
8082610050
Rating
47
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,552
Expenses
$6,771
Assets
$172,999
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DIANE PETERS-NGUYEN (PRESIDENT)
  • MAHEALANI MCCLELLAN (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • HARDY SPOEHR (DIRECTOR)
  • HAUNANI S APOLIONA (DIRECTOR)
  • MARK ANDERSON (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Perpetuating the legacy of queen lili'uokalani through programs and dissemination of works related to her life for the purose of uplifting the beneficiaries of liliuokalani trust, native hawaiians, and the broader community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Reprint and sales of published cultural sourcebooks. Production of video documentary "remembrances of our queen". Completion of draft of new book, "the diaries of queen liliuokalani", to be published in 2020.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 20
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 88
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 12.1%; rating input score 12
  • Program expense ratio: 34.1%; rating input score 34

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 65.4%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 25.55; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -24.9% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 12.1% of revenue deployed · 34.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 34/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.