Hugs for Tomorrow Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
881781323
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Azle, TX, USA
Rating
47
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$105,179
Expenses
$82,600
Assets
$60,463

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN JEWELL (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN JEWELL (PRESIDENT)
  • SAMANTHA JEWELL (SECRETARY)
  • TERRY HENDERSON (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Hugs for tomorrow inc. Hft a non-profit charitable organization under the laws of Texas is a charity formed and operated for the exclusive purpose of raising up underprivileged children in malawi africa to become self-sufficient adults who can provide for themselves and those around them. The scope of care includes nutrition medical care clothing and education for children living in poverty. It also includes meeting the immediate needs of their family members. We believe all of these elements of care are necessary to break the cycle of poverty and we trust that implementing them will bring about an effective result within the next twenty years at which point we will pass the baton to the children we have raised trusting that they will be equipped to bring up future generations without depending on our involvement.

What it reported doing in 2025

Basic needs: provided 2 meals a day 6 days a week to 209 children to ensure that they are receiving adequate nutrition needed to develop appropriately built a chicken coop to care for the animals providing nutrition for meals purchased clothing and school uniforms on an as-needed basis for program participants.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.5%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 62.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 28.7% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.