Hudson Valley Mental Health Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
203842923
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2019
Location
Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
Phone
8454521110
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Brain Disorders

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,860,422
Expenses
$2,450,560
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

28 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRIAN DOYLE (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • YUGANDHAR MUNNANGI (MEDICAL DIRECTOR): $341,858 total reported compensation
  • BRIAN DOYLE (CEO): $172,899 total reported compensation
  • JOAN CRAWFORD (CPO): $128,455 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provides clinical treatment services to clients in dutchess and ulster counties.

What it reported doing in 2019

Family services behavioral health centers provide adult outpatient behavioral health services clinical treatment to approximately 5,000 clients on an annual basis in dutchess and ulster counties. Both dutchess and ulster county local government units contract with family services to provide this level care for the community. Our outpatient centers are licensed by the nys office of mental health as article 31 outpatient clinic services. Treatment services include assessment, individual therapy, group therapy, psychiatric assessment, medication management, crisis and complex care management. All individuals receiving treatment at family services centers have a behavioral health related diagnosis and many have co-occurring substance abuse disorders. Our behavioral health therapy services are provided by nys licensed social workers, mental health counselors and marital and family therapists. Nys licensed psychiatrists and nurse practitioners provide psychiatric evaluations and medication management. Each client has an individualized service plan which is reviewed in collaboration with the treatment team. Family services treatment providers work collaboratively with other community agencies to enhance the services offered at its sites and to improve client engagement and overall experience. As part of the contract with dutchess county, family services continues providing clinical support to the re-entry stabilization transition and reintegration track (restart) in the dutchess county jail. The restart program is an innovative program targeting high recidivism rates for incarceration and is comprised of staff from hvmh, project more, & dcdbch. In 2019 the restart program staff worked with 345 clients in the dutchess county jail. In 2019, family services continued providing services to 66 individuals in the transition of care wellness project with access supports for living, our cbhs partner, and with westchester medical center (wmc). This project targeted clients being discharged from the wmc poughkeepsie campus and aimed to reduce emergency room visits and psychiatric in-patient admissions by engaging clients in care within 48 hours of hospital discharge.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 62% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 76.2%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -31.7%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.4%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 76.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $342K · 28 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $135K reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.