Hudson Soccer Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341766063
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Hudson, OH, USA
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $639,855
- Expenses
- $628,418
- Assets
- $224,300
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL ROSE (PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTIAN PATTON (VICE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL ROSE (PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTIAN PATTON (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- ADAM DIAMOND (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Teach and educate children through organized weekly soccer matches and soccer camps. To provide the means for young players to increase their game skills and to instill in them the spirit of competition, fair play and good sportsmanship.
What it reported doing in 2024
Recreational soccer learn2play is the organizations beginner program for children under the age of 6. It is a six stage program designed to give players weekly coaching instruction in the form of fun, soccer-related games and game play. Stage 1 ball skills. Stage 2 passing and receiving. Stage 3 basic tactics. Stage 4 footskills. Stage 5 defending and goalkeeping. Stage 6 advanced tactics. All six stages are taught in the same manner: a fun practice session where the drill teaches the skill, followed by a game where we will be seeing the lessons of the stage slowly being incorporated. It is the goal of l2p, to move all players through all six of our stages of player development. Then, they will have an excellent foundation for the next level of player development. Husc recreational soccer is a league of teams comprised of children from kindergarten through high school who live in or near hudson. The teams are coached by parents.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 12
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.2%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.8%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 7 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $628K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.