Hudson Milestones Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
221758926
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Jersey City, NJ, USA
Phone
2014347783
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,994,437
Expenses
$10,467,976
Assets
$17,541,760
Liabilities
$3,287,601

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TERESA MAIETTI (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • TERESA MAIETTI (CEO): $297,631 total reported compensation
  • AKENTEN OTI (CHIEF ADVISOR OF AUDITING/): $184,717 total reported compensation
  • DONNA DOLAN (DIRECTOR OF QUALITY ASSURA): $173,703 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Hudson milestones seeks to build and maintain a hudson county based organization dedicated to the care, support and advancement of people with developmental disabilities and their families towards achieving to the maximum extent possible the individual's life goals and establishing self-sufficiency in the community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Adult residential services the residential services department of hudson milestones consisted of eleven programs which served the needs of about 50 adults with intellectual/developmental disabilities. The effects of covid-19 continued to impact service delivery this year, as well. Residential services refers to living arrangements for 21-year-old or older adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (i/dd) which allow integration into the mainstream of community life. Some of the services provided were behavioral management, social and household skills, daily hygiene, financial management and transportation. Hudson milestones accepted residents from state developmental centers and community families. Services were provided to about 50 residents in nine group homes across hudson county.the group home and supervised apartment programs operated by hudson milestones provided a community integration living option for those who could no longer live with their families or on their own. This program avoids placements in state institutions and were funded at a fraction of the cost of institutionalization.the programs provided around the clock staff supervision for the clients in a home atmosphere. Assistance was provided as needed for the clients to be able to fulfill their daily needs and preferences. Medical care coordination, medication administration and fiscal management were additional services provided.the programs were geared towards teaching the clients how to become self-sufficient in a number of areas. The most common areas included social skills, household skills and daily hygiene. Each client had a personal "plan" tailored to their abilities. Along with the educational aspect of the program, community integration and recreation played a major part in the total service of the program. Recreational activities included special olympics, trips to museums, local theaters, overnight trips, dances and dining out at local restaurants, et al.day habilitation services - the purpose of hudson milestones' day habilitation programs was to provide individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities more meaningful and productive activities throughout the day.hudson milestones operated two day habilitation programs - in bayonne and jersey city. They provided day programming for under 100 residents of the hudson county community. This was below capacity due to the impact of the covid-19 pandemic, which drastically reduced attendance and induced temporary program closures and client absences.these centers were places of individual expression, learning and creation. Clients found ways to build relationships with peers while also increasing skills and interests which our innovative staff incorporated into their daily schedules. Programming was developed based on each person's interests, goals and needs. Our day habilitation curriculum emphasized learning social, safety and communication skills.we also offered activities such as learning interview techniques, filling out job applications and discussions about building job skills. Additional activities included collating, labeling and small-scale assembling and shredding. As always, our focus was on providing the full range of assistance a person needed for participation in their community, to the fullest extent of their capabilities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.9%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 78.6%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.8%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.68; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.1%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.9% of revenue deployed · 78.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $8.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $298K · 15 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1.7M reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.