Hudson Catskill Housing Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850517756
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Hudson, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5182919415
- Rating
- 51
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $740,521
- Expenses
- $761,032
- Assets
- $51,743
- Liabilities
- $33,950
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Quintin Cross (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Elliot Matos (Board Member): $35,638 total reported compensation
- Lukee Forbes (Board Member): $29,581 total reported compensation
- Quintin Cross (President): $19,700 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's mission is to educate and empower low-income tenants in the cities of Hudson and Catskill, New York, to address the social, racial and housing issues within their community with the help of their larger community.
What it reported doing in 2023
Conferences, conventions, and meetings - This includes money spent for our community events and conferences related to educating people about their rights related to housing. It also includes events held educating people on the Clean Slate Act of New York and how it can improve the negative effects related to housing. This also includes resources used to help create a Tenants' Hotline that provides free advice and access to resources to prevent homelessness.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 21
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 45.3%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 44.1%; rating input score 44
- Fundraising efficiency: $12.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Limited
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.8%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.66; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.8%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 45.3% of revenue deployed · 44.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 8 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $335K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $36K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.