HT Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813244828
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Burton, OH, USA
- Phone
- 4403215007
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $445,860
- Expenses
- $163,668
- Assets
- $1,235,059
- Liabilities
- $443
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Laura Bartchak (Executive Director)
- Pamela S Tomm (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Laura Bartchak (Executive Director): $53,875 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Harriet Tubman Movement serves victims of sex trafficking and forced prostitution by providing assistance, both materially and advocacy support, between the time a person is being exploited as a victim to a life of restoration and freedom.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Harriet Tubman Movement has grown over several years in offering individualized, tailored case management support for sex trafficking victim clients who are working toward a life of restoration. We have increased the number of undercover operations we have worked on as a Victim Service Providers with law enforcement. HTM became an employer in Ohio in January 2024. Laura Bartchak, who was a Founder and acting Director on a contracted basis, was employed, as well as the first Program Manager to add to the programming component and oversee direct services to clients. Volunteer Advocates actively worked with 41 new clients and 29 existing clients this year, with referrals from the Northeast Ohio Human Trafficking Task Force, the Mahoning Valley Human Trafficking Task Force, other law enforcement agencies, healthcare staff, shelters, counselors, and the community. Advocates were dispatched to assess the situation and provide for immediate needs such as food, clothing, or connection with medical services. Advocates transported victims to safe shelter and worked to develop rapport and present options for long-term restoration with new clients, as well as continuing to work with existing clients from previous year(s). Individualized goals were established and barriers to goals assessed. Material support, case management, and personal advocacy were offered to overcome those barriers, such as help obtaining IDs, working on court obligations, addressing medical issues and more. Transportation was then provided for our clients who chose to go to a long-term restoration program, both in and outside of Ohio. Programming was expanded to offer mentoring to survivors who returned to the area after completion of a program and/or those living locally, to aid the transition to independent living. Trafficking Awareness and education continued with over 1800 people hearing the message at various events. Strategic planning started with the goal of opening Ohios second trafficking-specific emergency home for women rescued from sex trafficking.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 78
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 35%; rating input score 35
- Program expense ratio: 84.6%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $127.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 63.3%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.55; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 32.9%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 32.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 57.8% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 35% of revenue deployed · 84.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $138K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $54K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 35/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.