HS&H Outreach Services A NJ Nonprofit Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
881666081
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Paterson, NJ, USA
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$99,800
Expenses
$17,415
Assets
$86,285

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jerry Jackson (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Jerry Jackson (Executive Director)
  • Esperanza Jenkins (Coordinator)
  • Nikki Hester (PT-Case Manager Medical Biller)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We provide Senior and Homeless services to insecure communities within Northern NJ. Our assistance includes food clothing medicare medicaid assistance, and education access to housing and sheltering and other services. The services we provide allows for essential assistance to be provided to vulnerable demographics within the areas we serve.

What it reported doing in 2025

Homeless Services: $80000 Budget Provides assistance with immediate services for those face housing food & clothing insecurities. Connecting clients to Emergency Hotel Stays shelters or permanent housing resources or Rental Assistance. Providing case management to ensure clients are able to obtain SNAP Medicaid SSI SSDI Medicare or other assistance they may need in order to improve their financial situation within 30-60 days. We assisted 890 individuals in 2025 assisted 150 individuals with permanent housing officially transitioning them from street or shelter homelessness.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 87% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 73
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 82.6%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.95; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 88.6%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 50.8% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 88.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 116.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $113K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.