Hozhoni Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860255127
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Flagstaff, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 9285267944
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Group Homes
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,792,880
- Expenses
- $10,931,341
- Assets
- $6,970,059
- Liabilities
- $3,591,131
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANTONIA KLOPSTEIN (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ANTONIA KLOPSTEIN (CEO): $121,312 total reported compensation
- LEX HEERDING (COO): $98,736 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Hozhonis mission is to provide individualized residential, vocational, and educational services primarily for people with disabilities. Hozhonis services are provided through group homes, employment services, school transition, and day programs for individuals in Northern Arizona. Hozhonis primary sources of funding are through service contracts with Arizona Department of Economic Security and the Navajo Nation.
What it reported doing in 2024
The day treatment and training service provides training, supervision, therapeutic activities, and counseling to promote skill development in independent living, self-care, communication and social relationships. A subsection of the program includes an art program, which is designed to encourage free forms of expression. This program is complemented by massage, music, and speech therapies as well as dental hygienic services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 87
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.1%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 79.2%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.3%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.52; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.1% of revenue deployed · 79.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $8.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $121K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.