Hoyas Basketball Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261673044
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Plover, WI, USA
Phone
7153402441
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$38,072
Expenses
$33,985
Assets
$28,917
Liabilities
$1,500

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOEL BASALA (PRESIDENT)
  • RANDY GRYWACZ (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOEL BASALA (PRESIDENT)
  • RANDY GRYWACZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • TIMOTHY FRANE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Education/training in basketball/athletic skills

What it reported doing in 2015

Scholarships for post-secondary tuition for pacelli hs graduates (benefits 2 students) grants to other school organizations for physical education/general education purposes (benefits approximately 600 students)

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 68% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 4
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3.9%; rating input score 4
  • Program expense ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 4

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.7%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -27.5% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 3.9% of revenue deployed · 4.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2011 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.