Howe Community Resource Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391910410
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Green Bay, WI, USA
- Phone
- 9204487340
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $705,687
- Expenses
- $553,677
- Assets
- $516,738
- Liabilities
- $26,823
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICKELL HARRIS LEFT IN 2025 (PRESIDENT)
- JOHN RAVIZZA LEFT IN 2025 (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARY ANN HITCH (PRESIDENT)
- KAITE MALONEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
- AMANDA JOHNSON LEFT IN 2025 (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- CORISSA FRANK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- AMANDA JOHNSON LEFT IN 2025 (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $83,995 total reported compensation
- CORISSA FRANK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $2,981 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Parenting(home visiting/parent education)- home visiting positive development through the early childhood years, positive and effective discipline, family bonding and positive family relationships. Parent education classes- the program offers basic information and tools to support you in the care of young children. Also teaches effective discipline, positive communication, and supportive encouragement.
What it reported doing in 2024
Parenting(home visiting/parent education)- home visiting positive development through the early childhood years, positive and effective discipline, family bonding and positive family relationships. Parent education classes- the program offers basic information and tools to support you in the care of young children. Also teaches effective discipline, positive communication, and supportive encouragement.served 60 families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.8%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 72.1%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $24.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.5%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.7%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.8% of revenue deployed · 72.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $399K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $84K · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.