Houston Taiwan Institute for Senior Citizens
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201822399
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 7132728989
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $202,945
- Expenses
- $160,271
- Assets
- $776,082
- Liabilities
- $354,961
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SAMUEL SHEN-HUNG HSU (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SAMUEL SHEN-HUNG HSU (PRESIDENT): $26,386 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Community education services for senior citizens life-long learning for sr. Citizens in class room setting, offering more than 20 classes yearly.
What it reported doing in 2024
Golf tournament event-fund raising event
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 75
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.5%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 76.8%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $17.8 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.84; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.5%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.5% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.5% of revenue deployed · 76.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 15 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $123K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $26K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.