Houston Southwest Heat Volleyball
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 205579556
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2012
- Location
- Missouri City, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2818518180
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $77,678
- Expenses
- $68,808
- Assets
- $8,108
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Houston Southwest HEAT Volleyball is a non-profit junior's volleyball club that was created in 2006 in an effort to provide Houston and Fort Bend juniors a place to enhance their volleyball skills while building competitive athletes who will compete against Houston's finest. We strive to teach our juniors the value of TEAMWORK; the importance of being competitive yet staying true to MORAL VALUES; how to communicate with authority figures and to learn to work on conflict resolutions as young adults. We also strive to keep our cost as low as possible. We only charge the amount needed for a team to compete and participate in Juniors USA volleyball. This enables many parents of the participants to be able to afford our services and provides an opportunity for their daughters to play, advance their skills and possibly be seen by college scouts.
What it reported doing in 2012
Athletic & Sports Programs, General/Other: Houston Southwest HEAT Volleyball was created in 2006 in an effort to provide Houston and Fort Bend juniors a place to enhance their volleyball skills while building competitive athletes who will compete against Houston's finest. We strive to teach our juniors the value of TEAMWORK; the importance of being competitive yet staying true to MORAL VALUES; how to communicate with authority figures and to learn to work on conflict resolutions as young adults. In 2012-2013 our teams succeeded in the following: Our 14s team received 1st place in Bronze at the MLK Challenge Tournament. The 12s team received 1st place in Bronze at the WSC Classic Wrap-Up Tournament. Our 15s team received 2nd place in Gold at the MLK Challenge Tournament. Ninety-eight percent of our players made their school volleyball teams. One of our freshmen players made Varsity middle blocker and another freshmen made the starting setter for the Varsity team.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.9%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 85.7%; rating input score 86
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.4%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -33% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -27.9% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -44.6% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.9% of revenue deployed · 85.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $59K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2009 to 2012
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.