Houston Resource and Education Center for Domestic Violence
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 993033338
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Victims' Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $65,415
- Expenses
- $50,000
- Assets
- $45,415
- Liabilities
- $15,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Elizabeth Flores (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Elizabeth Flores (Executive Director)
- Lisa Evans (Board Chair)
- Maylen Garcia (Board of Directors Program Manager)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Houston Resource and Education Center for Domestic Violence HREC4DV was formed to support survivors of domestic violence and underserved families by providing trauma-informed education emotional wellness support and essential resources that promote healing stability and long-term empowerment. Founded by survivors and community advocates the organization was created in response to the growing need for accessible compassionate and holistic services for individuals impacted by abuse trauma and economic hardship. HREC4DVs exempt purpose is to improve the well-being of vulnerable populations through programs focused on mental wellness domestic violence education food insecurity relief and transitional support services. The organizations primary goal is to help individuals and families break cycles of violence restore self-worth and build healthier safer futures through community-based support psychoeducation mental wellness and resource assistance.
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2025 our signature Wounds to Wisdom Domestic Violence Program impacted 596 survivors though support groups awareness initiatives educational training and outreach including Strength warehouse assistance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.7%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 76.8%; rating input score 77
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.6%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.91; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.33; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.7% of revenue deployed · 76.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $38K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.