Houston Hoops Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
760519815
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Kingwood, TX, USA
Phone
7135628070
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Basketball

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$400,000
Expenses
$416,701
Assets
$7,602
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • HAROLD PASTNER (DIRECTOR)
  • RECIE MEDLOCK (VICE CHAIRMAN)
  • CHRISTIAN BEGG (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The nbsp; houston nbsp; hoops nbsp; basketball nbsp; program nbsp; is nbsp; based nbsp; on nbsp; involvement nbsp; in nbsp; athletics nbsp; as nbsp; a nbsp; medium nbsp; to nbsp; address nbsp; some nbsp; of nbsp; the nbsp; many nbsp; problems nbsp; which nbsp; face nbsp; our nbsp; youth nbsp; today nbsp; specifically nbsp; problems nbsp; with nbsp; substance nbsp; abuse nbsp; gambling nbsp; and nbsp; early nbsp; withdrawal nbsp; from nbsp; school nbsp; hh nbsp; is nbsp; an nbsp; elite nbsp; youth nbsp; basket nbsp; ball nbsp; program nbsp; involving nbsp; inner nbsp; city nbsp; and nbsp; other nbsp; youth nbsp; from nbsp; grade nbsp;3-12 nbsp; and nbsp; their nbsp; families nbsp; participating nbsp; in nbsp; basketball nbsp; tournaments nbsp; throughout nbsp; the nbsp; us nbsp; emphasis nbsp; is nbsp; place nbsp; on nbsp; the nbsp; importance nbsp; of nbsp; meeting nbsp; educational nbsp; goals nbsp; and nbsp; preparation nbsp; for nbsp; all nbsp; levels nbsp; of nbsp; school nbsp; and nbsp; college nbsp; hh nbsp; has nbsp; worked nbsp; to nbsp; support nbsp; our nbsp; yo

What it reported doing in 2025

The houston hoops basketball program is based on involvement in athletics as a medium to address some of the many problems which face our youth today. Teaching our youth core values along with expanding their athletic ability. We encourage our players and develop them into well rounded athletes and productive members of society.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.2%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $417K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Fund balance restriction sum did not reconcile in the filed values.