Houston Classical Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 832516896
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 7137489626
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Charter Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,998,752
- Expenses
- $7,305,515
- Assets
- $14,517,928
- Liabilities
- $5,756,886
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- DEYVIS R SALAZAR (HEAD OF SCHO): $218,305 total reported compensation
- MADELYN MARRS (CHIEF OF SCH): $139,519 total reported compensation
- HANNAH RICHARD (DIR OF DEVEL): $136,982 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide a robust classical curriculum structured around the classical education concepts of grammar, logic, and rhetoric; gorunded in great works; and ordered by great ideas. Our classical model will focus on literacy, deep love of learning, and values.
What it reported doing in 2024
Educating kindergarten, 1st through 5th grade through a classical approach, rigorous academics, character development, and a structured environment. The school plans to expand one grade every year to eventually grow to k through 8th grade.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.9%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 86.9%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.74 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.6%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.99; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.4; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 42.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 43% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 53.6% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.9% of revenue deployed · 86.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $218K · 11 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $742K reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.