Houston Area Suicide Prevention Coalition Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
384332047
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Manvel, TX, USA
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Mental Health, Crisis Intervention N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$128,042
Expenses
$67,383
Assets
$65,540

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Christina Eyman (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Christina Eyman (Executive Director)
  • Diane Kaulen (Board Chair)
  • Bryan Long (Board Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

HASPC is a community coalition showing up for the Greater Houston region to prevent suicide deliver postvention support and response strengthen community resilience and normalize open conversations about mental health. The Houston Area Suicide Prevention Coalition works to reduce suicide in the Greater Houston area through community involvement and informed approaches.

What it reported doing in 2025

Development and launch of Ethans Legacy Institute. The institute aims to bridge the gap between individuals intentions and their readiness by providing accessible affordable and practical suicide prevention education. In 2025 this institute has trained over 700 individuals in suicide prevention awareness storytelling and postvention.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 37
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 27.7%; rating input score 28
  • Program expense ratio: 52.6%; rating input score 53

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 47.4%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.9%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 182.3% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 172.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 27.7% of revenue deployed · 52.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $35K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.