Houston Area Community Development Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
760380705
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Houston, TX, USA
Phone
7132220290
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,401,048
Expenses
$14,459,903
Assets
$104,793,654
Liabilities
$49,696,564

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Joy Horak-Brown (President & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Joy Horak-Brown (President & CEO): $382,524 total reported compensation
  • Tamara Foster (EVP Onsite Ops/Strategic Partnerships): $249,741 total reported compensation
  • Ron Lastimosa (VP Real Estate Development): $234,541 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See Schedule O

What it reported doing in 2024

NHH at Harrisburg - 175 unitsNew Hope opened its first mixed-use development, NHH at Harrisburg. This transit-oriented community is a 175-unit SRO serving individuals living on extremely low incomes. The nonprofit organization celebrated a grand opening in April 2018. Located on the light rail in Houston's East End, Harrisburg also includes 4,000 SF of retail space and 7,500 SF of commercial office space, which is now home to New Hope's corporate office. Underscoring their commitment to mission, New Hope located their headquarters where their residents live. As the organization's fourth LEED platinum certified development, NHH at Harrisburg was designed by Ernesto L. Maldonado, AIA of GSMA, Inc.As evidence of its impact on the community, Harrisburg has already been honored with several awards and accolades, including: the 2019 Houston Business Journal Landmark Award in Community Impact; the Houston Apartment Association Landmark Award in Tax Credits; the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials Award of Excellence; and, the U.S. Green Building Council Leadership Award. The City of Houston committed $6.6MM in HOME funds plus a portion of local Homeless Bond Program funds. To create a true public/private partnership, New Hope leveraged these funds with 4% Housing Tax Credits and Bonds, allocated by the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, in addition to grants and contributions from private sources. Under the terms of an agreement for the sale of New Hope's original 129-unit Hamilton Street Residence, Hamilton closed when Harrisburg opened. Hamilton residents were given the opportunity to move to the new 175-unit Harrisburg property or to another New Hope property of their choice, based on availability and eligibility.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 43% for direct work, and 57% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 69
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 96.1%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.9%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.25; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.47; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 16 filed program accomplishments · $13.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $383K · 22 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $50.5M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 22 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.