Housing Initiative Partnership Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521596171
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Hyattsville, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3016993835
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Housing Rehabilitation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,711,826
- Expenses
- $9,423,632
- Assets
- $37,492,253
- Liabilities
- $34,808,534
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHANIE PRANGE PROESTEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- STEPHANIE PRANGE PROESTEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $170,723 total reported compensation
- MARY HUNTER (DIRECTOR OF HOUSING COUNSE): $135,298 total reported compensation
- HELEN JOHNSON (HIGHEST COMPENSATED EMPLOYEE): $129,793 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Housing initiative partnership, inc. (hip) develops innovative affordable housing, revitalizes neighborhoods and equips people to achieve their housing and financial goals. Hip's vision is that every person lives in high-quality affordable housing in a thriving community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Housing counseling - rental education and counseling services help clients locate and maintain affordable rental housing. Hip's counselors assist with housing search strategies, financial capability, tenant rights education, eviction prevention, and communication with landlords. Services include rent affordability analysis, identification of affordable housing opportunities, credit building, budget analysis, group educational sessions (virtual and in person) on local and state rent laws, fair housing rights education, guidance about the local eviction process, and application assistance for emergency rent assistance and all other rental and utility assistance resources. Housing stabilization - hip is the leading provider of rapid rehousing services in prince george's county. Rapid rehousing follows a housing first approach and is a primary solution for ending homelessness. Hip's case managers provide housing identification services, short-term rental assistance, and case management services to help individuals and families to quickly exit homelessness and secure permanent housing. Case management services include assessment of barriers to housing retention, creation of household budgets, development of individualized housing stability plans, tenancy skills education and coaching, connection to mainstream benefits and community resources, and advocacy with property owners and service providers. The program's intensity adjusts based on ongoing assessment and client progress.home sharing - hip launched a home sharing pilot program in january 2021, in partnership with montgomery county department of health and human services (dhhs), in which hip facilitates stable room rental agreements between homeowners and home seekers. The goal of the program is to help older homeowners age in place by reducing social isolation, creating monthly income for the homeowners, and encouraging long-term rental agreements where the renter may also assist with extra housekeeping, errands, or transportation help in exchange for lower rent.financial empowerment center - the gaithersburg financial empowerment center opened in march 2022 as a partnership between the city of gaithersburg and hip as the nonprofit provider. The model calls for financial counseling as a free public service of a municipality. Hip's certified financial counselors provide free, confidential financial counseling to help individuals and families pay down debt, establish good credit, develop budgeting skills and connect to safe, lowcost banking systems. This approach is data-driven and outcome-focused, backed by research confirming that low- and moderate-income clients can make significant improvements in their financial situation with financial counseling.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 62% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 93.7%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: $37.86 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.9%; rating input score 99; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -40.4%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.98; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.93; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $8.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $171K · 14 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1.8M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 14 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.