Housing Industry Foundation for Education

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311605732
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Phone
4124345690
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Job Training

Reported finances

Revenue
$-9,762
Expenses
$3,285
Assets
$25,522
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JAMES EICHENLAUB (TRUSTEE)
  • DAN MEADE (TRUSTEE)
  • HEATHER DIECKMANN (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The housing industry foundation for education promotes vocational training in southwestern Pennsylvania in the construction industry.

What it reported doing in 2024

The housing industry foundation for education promotes and assists vocational training programs for the purpose of increasing the number of men and women working in the housing construction trades. The foundation works in cooperation with local vocational technical training schools to blend their classroom training with professional, hands-on guidance to give students a better understanding of the technical training and skills needed to succeed in the construction industry. Foundation support provides logistical coordination and project administration, and facilitates professional guidance for students working in community based construction projects. The foundation also offers scholarship opportunities for persons seeking financial assistance in support of furthering their education in construction related fields.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -133.7%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.77; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.