The House of the Good Shepherd

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
150532199
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Utica, NY, US
Phone
315.235.7770
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Children's, Youth Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$43,562,347
Expenses
$43,380,490
Assets
$29,705,492
Liabilities
$5,679,404

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DOMINICK MANFREDO (PRESIDENT)
  • ELIZABETH POLE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SAM BERARDINO III (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • BRIAN MCKEE (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JORGE FALERO (PSYCHIATRIST): $365,535 total reported compensation
  • BRIAN MCKEE (CEO): $353,191 total reported compensation
  • KATHLEEN PERKINS (CPO): $205,673 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The House of the Good Shepherd provides treatment, education, and support programs to children and families in the communities we serve.

What it reported doing in 2024

Child care & support - the house of the good shepherd provided food, clothing and shelter for just under 1000 children during the fiscal year through a variety of programs: approximately, 450 children from oneida, herkimer, jefferson, lewis, st. Lawrence, and franklin counties (ny) were served each day in foster family homes. Offices in utica and watertown coordinate regular and therapeutic levels of foster care. These services provide intensive care coordination and support services to children for the purpose of maintaining them in a family home setting birth, kinship or foster boarding home families. Youth and families residing in the 14 county central New York area are prioritized for this program. Two children's residences, designated as "hard to place" congregate care settings provide boys and girls, ages 6 to 18, living on-campus with the treatment and support they need to reunite with their families or to prepare them to live on their own. Services include a variety of mental health services, care coordination and case management, recreational and therapeutic services, independent living training, post discharge case management and in-home support services. The group emergency foster care residence provides children in crisis, ages 6 to 11, short-term diagnostic treatment. During their stay children are evaluated to identify treatment and placement services needed to address individual and family issues in order to facilitate the return of children to their families or other placements. Up to 14 children at a time may be served in the schafer residence, which is a psychiatric residential treatment facility. This residence serves children 8 to 18 and provides 24-hour nursing care, psychiatric, psychological, social work and mental health counseling, recreation, and therapeutic and case management services. Non-secure detention provides boys and girls, ages 12 to 18, waiting to appear in family court with short-term housing, schooling and support services. Placement can only occur as a result of a family court remand or by law enforcement authorities managing an off-hours awol situation. Raise the age is a residential program that provides boys, ages 16 and 17, who have been adjudicated by the court for non-violent crimes, with intervention and evidence based treatment. These boys will stay in our residence for 8 months where they will receive a variety of mental health services, care coordination and case management, recreational and therapeutic services. Youths will receive post-discharge case management.pivot is a residential program that provides boys, ages 13 15, who have been adjudicated by the court for non-violent crimes with highly structured days focusing on education, vocational exploration and life skills. Teens are tasked with taking ownership of their actions and providing accountability for their decisions. The respite program provides families and foster parents with short-term, out of home services that offer temporary relief while improving family cohesiveness and long-term stability. The program is voluntary and serves children between the ages of 8 and 17, who are referred by oneida county dcfs for up to 49 days per year. Children in the program receive community based clinical and medical services while participating in their current education program. Health homes provides approximately 150 youth in oneida and jefferson counties with comprehensive care management. This program refers children to community and social support services with the goal of keeping them mentally and physically healthy.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.1%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.4%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 9 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 84.1% of revenue deployed · 85.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $37M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $366K · 23 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.