House of Neighborly Service of The

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
860170313
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2012
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Tucson, AZ, USA
Phone
5206230100
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Neighborhood Centers
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$79,863
Expenses
$104,083
Assets
$129,185

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The house of neighborly servce is a presbyterian mission, whose purpose is to promote a healthy community by serving the sprititual, social and physical needs of children and families of the city of south tucson.

What it reported doing in 2012

House of neighborly service collaborates with our family services, which provides a senior program and a year round afterschool program with the primary focus of youth literacy and leadership building. In addition, house of neighborly service offers summer mini camps to help facilitate continued learning though the summer. Statement of program service accomplishments afterschool programthe house of neighborly service provdes facilities, for the afterschool program, run year round, for youth k-5. The program is run by our family services and focuses on anti-bullying, leadership and educational field trips. House of neighborly service held five mini camps during the summer focusing on culinary arts, nutrition, music, and dance theatre. The summer camps are for youth 6-14 year olds. House of neighborly service organized a girls on the run team with the goals of helping girls become healthy and self confident.the facility the grounds, which are open to the public 7:00 am to 9:00 pm, include a plaza, play area, garden, shaded tables, lighted basketball court, and 1/8 mile walking path. The facility includes five buildings that are used by the programs, for meetings and by three baille folkloric groups for practicing.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 93
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 81.9%; rating input score 82

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -30.3%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.3% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 81.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $85K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2009 to 2012
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.