House of Joseph Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 881243027
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Rego Park, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7186786269
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $28,162
- Expenses
- $26,005
- Assets
- $7,557
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROGELIO C IGNACIO (PRESIDENT - FOUNDER)
People named in this filing
- ROGELIO C IGNACIO (PRESIDENT - FOUNDER)
- CONSOLACION A CAYABA (VP - NEW YORK)
- ROSTUM G AQUINO (VP - PHILIPPINES)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization provides assistance, resources and support to students, seminarians, elderly, and other individuals in the community and/or ministries in the geographical area of the philippines, in order to improve their education and enhance their quality of life. The organization provides funding to organizations, foundations, parishes, ministries or individuals and communities that will serve the purpose and mission of the organization.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization entered into a memorandum agreement with josefheim foundation inc (jfi) a non-profit organization incorporated under the laws of the philippines to carry out programs intended to enhance the quality of life through education and community development.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 11
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 11.2%; rating input score 11
- Program expense ratio: 12.1%; rating input score 12
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.7%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 96% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 11.2% of revenue deployed · 12.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.