House of Hugs for Women & Children

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
852115762
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Greenville, NC, USA
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only

Reported finances

Revenue
$29,057
Expenses
$19,852
Assets
$58,889

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Charniece Harris (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Charniece Harris (Executive Director)
  • Rene Nottage (Treasurer)
  • Loren Rabbat (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Charitable organization

What it reported doing in 2024

HUGS Life EnRICHment Program- HUGS Life EnRICHment Program assists participants in achieving economic self- sufficiency creating growth opportunities and becoming healthier in all areas through a wide range of options. H.U.G.S Life EnRICHment Program provides direct instructions in financial literacy employability communication life coping skills and overall health and wellness. The program consists of 2 classes per month @ 1 1 2-2 hours each and is scheduled to run for 12 months. Classes are composed of lectures written assignments small group activities role play and Q&A sessions. The program is offered at no cost to the general public ages 18 and older with recruitment focused primarily on minorities and women with low to moderate income. The class is ongoing with an ending date for the 1st year being Sept 2024.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.3%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 99.9%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 31.7%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.97; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 75.1% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 32.6% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.3% of revenue deployed · 99.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $20K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.