House of Grace and Hope
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 275489532
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8328154295
- Rating
- 35
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Religion Related N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Religious (unspecified)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,167
- Expenses
- $8,843
- Assets
- $15,828
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TRAVIS PURVIS (PRESIDENT/ DIRECTOR)
- BRYAN COLLINS (VICE PRESIDENT/ DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- TRAVIS PURVIS (PRESIDENT/ DIRECTOR)
- BRYAN COLLINS (VICE PRESIDENT/ DIRECTOR)
- TODD HARRIS (SECRETARY/ DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
House of grace and hope is a non-profit organization founded for the purpose of assisting orphans and families and individuals in need. The board members of house of grace and hope seek to match generous donors with specific achievable projects in the united states and around the world. The board is committed to identifying viable projects and maintaining a personal connection with the project and donors. Current and planned projects include the construction of houses, support of organizations with shared objectives, support of education for individuals, and both emotional and physiological support for those in need.
What it reported doing in 2020
House of grace and hope is a non-profit organization founded for the purpose of assisting orphans and families and individuals in need. The board members of house of grace and hope seek to match generous donors with specific achievable projects in the united states and around the world. The board is committed to identifying viable projects and maintaining a personal connection with the project and donors. Current and planned projects include the construction of houses, support of organizations with shared objectives, support of education for individuals, and both emotional and physiological support for those in need. House of grace and hope is concentrated with an orphanage in russia and management is looking to explore work in other countries.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -657.8%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.79; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -46% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -33.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.