Hospitality Education Foundation of Georgia Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
582340138
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Phone
6788878009
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Employment Procurement Assistance

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$132,648
Expenses
$176,542
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SIMONE BYRON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • JILL DANIELI (BOARD MEMBER)
  • GENEVIEVE STONA (BOARD MEMBER)
  • DARYL SHULAR (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Education of hospitality and food service students, facilitating providing direct support for the industry experiences, connecting the classroom with industry professionals amd resources, and inspiring students and shaping their future with real world experiences.

What it reported doing in 2020

Thirty five executive chefs and ten restaurant executives judge Georgia's top culinary and managment teams to determine which school will represent Georgia at the national prostart invitational. Every student competitor wins scholarships and the top three places win thousands of dollars in college scholarships, medals, and trophies. The first place culinary team and the first place management team win an all expense paid trip for the five day national prostart invitational in anaheim, California.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 3
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -33.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 39.9%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -35.6% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.8% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2016 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.