Hospital Medical Imaging Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232472600
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2016
Forms available
Form 990 2016
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2154648050
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient

Reported finances

Revenue
$40,913
Expenses
$175,503
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATHLEEN KINSLOW (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • KATHLEEN KINSLOW (PRESIDENT): $122,057 total reported compensation
  • ANDREW DEVOE (TREASURER): $71,960 total reported compensation
  • RAFAEL M VILLALOBOS JR (SECRETARY): $52,976 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Hospital medical imaging was formed to provide health care services to the greater northeast philadelphia & lower bucks county Pennsylvania communities.

What it reported doing in 2016

Managing general partner to medical imaging associates partnership which operates magnetic resonance imaging centers which provide diagnostic services to the northeast philadelphia and lower bucks county Pennsylvania communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 5
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 22
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 8.1%; rating input score 8
  • Program expense ratio: 1.9%; rating input score 2
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 28.6%; rating input score 29; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 11
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -329%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.9%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -32% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.3% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.5% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 8.1% of revenue deployed · 1.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 7 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $122K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes related organizations
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 8/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 29/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.