Hospital Council of Northwest Ohio
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341116795
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Toledo, OH, USA
- Phone
- 4198420800
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,583,244
- Expenses
- $7,105,785
- Assets
- $6,025,650
- Liabilities
- $925,394
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
29 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIMBERLY TEMPLE (VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE)
- PAM JENSEN (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- PAM JENSEN (PRESIDENT & CEO): $268,024 total reported compensation
- KIMBERLY TEMPLE (VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE): $250,272 total reported compensation
- CAROLYN S TRUMBULL (NOSS PROGRAM & SERVICES DIRECTOR): $154,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The hospital council of northwest Ohio is a member-driven organization that represents and advocates on behalf of its member hospitals and health systems, and provides collaborative opportunities to enhance the health status of the citizens of northwest Ohio. See schedule o.the hospital council is dedicated to: bringing together northwest Ohio's health care leaders.providing collaborative opportunities to address healthcare providers' shared concerns.developing creative health-related initiatives to improve the region's health status.providing educational programs for the healthcare sector.
What it reported doing in 2024
The hospital council of northwest Ohio brings together healthcare providers, public health agencies, and community partners to address shared challenges, improve access to care, and strengthen the health of communities across the region. Through collaborative planning, innovative programs, and capacity-building support, hcno helps reduce disparities, enhance emergency preparedness, and promote long-term wellness.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 61% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 49% for direct work, and 51% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.2%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 90.9%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.9%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.6%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.2% of revenue deployed · 90.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 25 of 25 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $268K · 29 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 36 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 25 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.