Hospice of Saint John Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742254709
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2011
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011
- Location
- Lakewood, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3032327900
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Hospices
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,686,222
- Expenses
- $15,579,486
- Assets
- $7,546,687
- Liabilities
- $5,155,539
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the hospice of saint john is to provide a caring environment for the physical and emotional needs of the terminally ill and their families.
What it reported doing in 2011
Hospice of saint john foundation operates a licensed 44-bed long-term care facility and home hospice program for "in-home" care, as well as in nursing homes and assisted living residences providing healthcare, psychosocial, and spiritual support for the terminally ill and their families. The foundation provided for 13,695 inpatient days and provided 53,112 homecare patient days.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 78.6%; rating input score 79; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.68; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.7%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 11 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $95K · 15 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.