Hospice of Miami County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311031277
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Troy, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9372564490
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $140,485
- Expenses
- $16,631
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KENT ANDERSON (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
People named in this filing
- PETE HALEY (CHAIR)
- GARY LEROY (VICE CHAIR)
- GENE THORN (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The hospice of miami county, inc. Is committed to making quality hospice care available and accessible to terminally ill persons and their families, regardless of ability pay, and in a manner consistent with the highest hospice standards. Our commitment to the hospice philosophy of care includes a compassionate staff pledged to continuously improve and enhance the care we provide, respect the patients' choices of care, respond to changing community needs, and serve as a resource to others for improving the availability of quality hospice care. Effective december 31, 2025, this entity ceased operations, and its activities are now conducted directly by Ohio's hospice.
What it reported doing in 2025
Coordinates a program of home, outpatient, and inpatient hospice care that provides palliative care, supportive medical services, and other support services to terminally ill persons and their families, regardless of ability to pay. Effective december 31, 2025, this entity ceased operations, and its activities are now conducted directly by Ohio's hospice.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.1%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0.6%; rating input score 1
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 88.2%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0.1% of revenue deployed · 0.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $95 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 11 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.