Hospice of Kitsap County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911089902
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017
- Location
- Silverdale, WA, USA
- Phone
- 9189918210
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospices
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,453
- Expenses
- $1,225,054
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUZANNE PLEMMONS RN MN PHCNS (PRESIDENT)
- KEVIN TURNER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- KEVIN TURNER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $7,575 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
For 36 years, hospice of kitsap county has provided for the physical, emotional and spiritual needs of patients, families, and members of our community who face life-threatening illnesses and loss. This high quality supportive care is provided to all in need.
What it reported doing in 2017
All operations were sold to multicare health system on january 31, 2016. This form 990 is being filed to report the termination of all activities, transfer of remaining assets, and dissolution.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 4
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 93.8%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -49,841.1%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.6%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -39.7% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -22.2% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -25.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $8K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2010 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.