Hospice Family Care Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860722971
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2011
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011
- Location
- Mesa, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 4808891116
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $99,964
- Expenses
- $564,572
- Assets
- $456,477
- Liabilities
- $63,350
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The hospice family care foundation, inc. Is a charitable, grant-making organization dedicated to improving the quality of life for the terminally ill, their families and support systems by providing financial assistance, medical and non-medical goods and services and reimbursement to hospice providers when alternate payer sources are not available and the patient meets all eligibility requirements. The foundation is also committed to providing education to the medical and lay communities in the unique benefits of the hospice philosophy, provide scholarships to healthcare workers to continue their professional education and provide bereavement support services when those needs exceed beyond the hospice program's responsibility as defined by medicare and state regulations.
What it reported doing in 2011
The foundation provided financial assistance to numerous hospice patients and their families. The total number of patients served in 2011 was 97 patients for burial/cremation services, 44 patients needing financial support for utilities, 33 patients needing food vouchers, 47 patients needing financial support for housing, 38 patients with other family requests, 46 patients needing hospice medical care. In addition, 376 patients were served thanksgiving and christmas dinners.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 14
- Sustainability: 14
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 96.4%; rating input score 96; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -464.8%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.8%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $481K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $664K · 3 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.