HorseFriends

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510534956
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2018
Location
High Point, NC, USA
Phone
3363243767
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Personal Social Services
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$58,935
Expenses
$86,952
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Marty Shilling (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Kim Adams (Director)
  • Jennifer Johnson (Pres/Treas)
  • Marty Shilling (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Sharing the blessings of Christ with our community by providing equine programs that develop confidence, physical and emotional strength for our participants and volunteers.Located in Summerfield, NC, and serving the greater Greensboro area. HorseFriends provides, free of charge, mounted and non-mounted horse interactions for individuals with disabilities, regardless of their religious beliefs.

What it reported doing in 2021

Sharing the blessings of Christ with our community by providing equine programs that develop confidence, physical and emotional strength for our participants and volunteers.Located in Summerfield, NC, and serving the greater Greensboro area. HorseFriends provides, free of charge, mounted and non-mounted horse interactions for individuals with disabilities, regardless of their religious beliefs.The organization also participated in two parades and open houses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 13
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -47.5%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -30.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -96.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.