Horizon Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942365021
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Hayward, CA, USA
Phone
5105822100
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$21,567,979
Expenses
$20,811,393
Assets
$19,494,200
Liabilities
$10,485,711

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAIME CAMPOS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • JAIME CAMPOS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $290,216 total reported compensation
  • LUSINE GHEVONDYAN (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $228,255 total reported compensation
  • ANNA PHILLIPS (CHIEF PROGRAM OFFICER (THRU 4/25)): $191,349 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Horizon services, inc., (the agency) is a not-for-profit community-based organization committed to reducing alcohol and other drug related problems of individuals, families and communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Project eden-provides education, prevention and counseling programs in alameda county for individuals and families. Programs include outpatient treatment, crisis intervention, school outreach and youth alternatives. Chrysalis is a 16-bed, community-based residential program for women recovering from addiction to alcohol or other drugs and who also have a co-occurring mental health diagnosis.mission street provides sobering services in santa clara county to men and women recovering from alcohol and other drug abuse, providing a safe, supportive, atmosphere and referral options.butte county sobering center provides sobering services in butte county to men and women recovering from alcohol and other drug abuse, providing a safe, supportive atmosphere, and referral options.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 95% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.7%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $823.45 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.5%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.54; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.8% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.7% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $18.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $290K · 18 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $930K reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.