Horizon House
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 910725802
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Seattle, WA, US
- Phone
- 206-649-4777
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $43,899,919
- Expenses
- $39,050,677
- Assets
- $252,938,858
- Liabilities
- $195,126,745
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALEXANDRA TIBBETTS (PRESIDENT)
- MARCIA ALMQUIST (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ERICA THRASH-SALL (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ERICA THRASH-SALL (CEO): $424,382 total reported compensation
- CHRISTINE SEYMOUR (CFO): $306,362 total reported compensation
- LAURI WARFIELD-LARSON (COO): $305,964 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Horizon House is a nonprofit continuing care retirement community that provides independent living, assisted living, and memory support services on Seattle's First Hill, with a resident-led governance model that ensures residents have a direct voice in major decisions.
What it reported doing in 2024
Horizon house has a long-standing commitment to social accountability. Residents, staff and the entire organization give time and financial support to those in need. This support is offered to those living in horizon house and in the broader community. Horizon house, a not-for-profit retirement community was founded in 1961, becoming the first retirement community in downtown seattle. Founding members were civic leaders and members of the united church of christ who established a commitment to social justice, community outreach and social accountability which continues to this day. Horizon house is a continuing care retirement community with 377 independent living apartments and 90 assisted living health care apartments. There are approximately 480 residents at horizon house and a staff of 201. Comprehensive health services include wellness/exercise, rehabilitation therapy, home care, and assisted and nursing care in addition to educational classes and many social and cultural events.horizon house is governed by a 10 to 15-member board of trustees who serves without compensation. The board is comprised of men and women with professional expertise in the leadership and operational areas of horizon house. A three-member executive team is responsible for the administrative leadership of horizon house.examples of community outreach and social accountabilitysome highlights from 2024 include:- charitable care for residents unable to pay in the amount of $471,440 enabling them to remain at horizon house and eliminating the need for government assistance and subsidies. Distribution of $4,038 to employees in need of assistance. These distributions are funded by our generous donors consisting of residents, families, vendors, and staff.- donations to community not-for-profit groups in honor of deceased horizon house residents for a total of $950.- horizon house is a member of various non-profit associations including the council of health & human services ministries of the united church of christ, leadingage, first hill improvement association, and the jim ellis freeway park association. A community grants program provides funding to organizations that support programs and services to older adults - grants and donations for their charitable work in the broader community in the total amount of $50,000.- volunteer hours donated by horizon house residents to community non-profit include sewing & knitting for harborview and plymouth housing and friends of the library book cart. Due to covid-19 and safety for our residents many volunteering services were cancelled.2024 total donated dollars:$ 475,478 in charitable dollars (resident care and employee assistance)$ 50,950 (community grants to organizations, memorial gifts)$ 526,428 total donated dollars
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.7%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 82.3%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.51 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 87.1%; rating input score 87; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.48; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.77; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 72.7% of revenue deployed · 82.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $32.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $424K · 20 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $17M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 9/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.