Horizon Circle

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
333973673
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Dallas, TX, USA
Phone
3238234412
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,601
Expenses
$19,089
Assets
$245,547
Liabilities
$262,035

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Emmanuel Villaume (President)
  • Andrew von Oeyen (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Emmanuel Villaume (President)
  • Andrew von Oeyen (Vice President)
  • Bobby Ralston (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Horizon Circle promotes, produces or provides access to world classical music concerts to create enriching cultural experiences to connect diverse audiences and foster greater understanding between people and cultures. For each Horizon Circle event, we carefully select a partner nonprofit organization (the beneficiary) that promotes performing arts or makes a significant impact in health, education, social justice and other pressing challenges in our community to support with the funds raised at that event.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, Horizon Circle produced three world-class classical music concerts (two in Malibu, California and one in Dallas, Texas) which raised money to support (1) Project Angel Food, an organization that nourishes the health and spirit of people facing critical and life-threatening illnesses in Los Angeles County by preparing and delivering medically tailored meals, and (2) the upcoming Prague Philharmonia 2026 US tour.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -633.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.86; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.07; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $19K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.