Hopkins County Health Care Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 752845157
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Sulphur Springs, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9034384799
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,102,662
- Expenses
- $734,684
- Assets
- $1,448,766
- Liabilities
- $2,806
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
People named in this filing
- PAUL HARVEY (EX OFFICIO (THRU 01/2025))
- CHARLES HELM (DIRECTOR)
- JIMMY JONES (DIRECTOR (THRU 07/2024))
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary purpose of the hopkins county health care foundation is to promote philanthropy and charitable giving in order to provide resources to enhance the ability of christus health and christus hopkins health alliance in their mission of extending the healing ministry of jesus christ by providing for the community's health needs. In furtherance of those purposes, the foundation solicits and receives charitable gifts and grants to administer and invest and reinvest the same and to apply the whole or any part of the income and the principal exclusively for the benefit of the health care facilities, services and health community programs supported or operated by christus hopkins health alliance within its service area in northeast Texas.
What it reported doing in 2024
Hopkins county health care foundation (the "foundation") is a Texas non-profit organization serving the philanthropic needs of christus hopkins health alliance (the "hospital") and the hopkins county hospital district (the "district"). It is the foundation's responsibility to encourage and receive contributions from individuals, corporations, associations, and foundations. These contributions are distributed to the hospital and its affiliated hopkins county facilities and the district, in accordance with the intentions of the donors and within the confines of the foundation's goals and objectives. All contributions assist the hospital and the district in continuing to provide high quality health care in areas such as modernization and construction of facilities as needed, acquisition of equipment, and other special health care needs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 78% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.1%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.4%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.97; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $735K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.