Hopenet Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 481105407
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2011
- Location
- Wichita, KS, USA
- Phone
- 3166844673
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,444,363
- Expenses
- $1,424,689
- Assets
- $1,468,673
- Liabilities
- $52,933
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NIKKI HANSSON (PRESIDENT)
- DR TIM SHAVER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTIANE DOOM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRISTIANE DOOM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $70,847 total reported compensation
- SHANNON SANDERS (CONTROLLER): $45,750 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To offer comprehensive and professional services based on christ's love and aimed at restoring dignity and hope. Hopenet is a faith-based organization that is transforming lives.
What it reported doing in 2025
Hopenet is a faith-based organization that is transforming lives which ultimately impacts the community. There are direct and indirect program services. Direct services includes engagement services, coaching services and counseling services. Engagement services provides community awareness and connects peoples to resources. Coaching services addresses practical, personal and professional goals. Counseling services foster emotional healing.indirect services including community awareness and training services. Community awareness destigmatizes mental illness and promotes access to mental health. Training services provide educational information and practical tools to individuals and groups. Services are provided confidentially by trained, licensed and certified professional providers skilled to come alongside people seeking emotional health and wellness.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.6%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 75.6%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $97.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.4%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.03; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.2%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.6% of revenue deployed · 75.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $71K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.