Hopekids Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 861042378
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Scottsdale, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 8003195845
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,933,405
- Expenses
- $8,818,762
- Assets
- $4,206,320
- Liabilities
- $33,715
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOSH TAYLOR (PRESIDENT)
- BRIAN ANDERSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - MINNESOTA)
Highest reported compensation
- JOSH TAYLOR (PRESIDENT): $240,315 total reported compensation
- KEITH WATKINS (DIRECTOR OF TECHNOLOGY): $160,947 total reported compensation
- KIMBERLY TRICHEL (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS): $153,920 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide ongoing events and activities and a powerful, unique support community for families who have a child with cancer or some other life-threatening medical condition.
What it reported doing in 2025
Virtual program - in response to covid we created a new virtual program of events where we were able to bring an entirely new and creative program to the families in the safety of their homes and their hospital beds. We were able to easily connect families across all chapters like never before. As a result, we realized there is benefit to our families to continuing to provide virtual opportunities regardless of a pandemic. Our families are always isolated over winter due to their child's medical condition, or spending weeks and months in hospital or traveling across the country for specialized treatments. Through our virtual program we will always be able to bring hope to our families through fun and unique programming, no matter where their circumstances find them. - see schedule o.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 92
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.3%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 88.1%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.3%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.5%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.3% of revenue deployed · 88.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $7.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $240K · 11 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.